In an application to restore an appeal dismissed for want of pre-deposit, the Appellate Tribunal accepted the submission that 25% pre-deposit was made. The appeal was restored to its original number and disposed of.
Appeal restored to its original number; notices issued for waiver applications and further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Application No.119/2021 in Appeal No.493/2019 Arising out of O.A.No.483/2017(DRT, Jaipur)
Smt. Darshana Goyal Vs Oriental Bank of Commercial
14.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, Ld. counsel for appellant
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Misc. Application No.119/2021
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has made 25% pre-deposit and, therefore, the appeal which was dismissed on 27.09.2021 for want of pre-deposit may be restored.
Heard. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is restored to its original number.
Application stands disposed of.
Let notice on the applications for waiver of balance pre-deposit (I.A. No.1225/2019), condonation of delay (I.A. No.1230/2019) as well as in the appeal be issued to the respondents by all permissible modes for 01.02.2023. Notices on the application for condonation of delay and in the appeal are, however, subject to the decision to be taken on the application for waiver of balance 25% pre-deposit after hearing the opposite counsel.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal may be restored after payment of 25% pre-deposit?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Darshana Goyal
Oriental Bank of Commercial
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
