The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the bank's appeal as withdrawn and infructuous since the appellant had withdrawn the notice under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.130/2021 Arising out of S.A.No.169/2019(DRT-II, Delhi)
Union Bank of India (Erstwhile “Andhra Bank”) Vs
M/s Tushkar’s
17.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. N.P. Gaur, Ld. counsel for appellant bank
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for appellant bank states that the bank has withdrawn the notice under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act and, therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous. He seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Union Bank of India (Erstwhile Andhra Bank)
M/s Tushkar's
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
