In this interim order, the tribunal granted the respondent bank four weeks to file a reply. The matter was listed for final arguments on 08.12.2022, and the interim stay was continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 114/2022
Arising out of O.A. No. 1727/2017 (DRT-II, Chandigarh)
R.H. Agro Overseas Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Vs
State Bank of India & Ors.
14.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Rajesh Sharma and Mr. Ravi Data, Ld. counsel for appellants
Ms. Prerana Sabharwal, Ld. counsel for respondent
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ms. Prerana Sabharwal, learned counsel, has appeared on behalf of the respondent no.1 bank. She seeks time to file reply. Let reply be filed within four weeks and rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks thereafter.
List for 08.12.2022 for final arguments.
Interim order to continue.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
R.H. Agro Overseas Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
State Bank of India & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
