M/ S Jainam Dormitory v. Punjab National Bank and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for the appellant recused himself to become a judge. The registry directed himself to engage another counsel and listed the case for service in the absence of the appellant.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 365/2020 Date: 13.05.2022
M/s Jainam Dormitory Vs. Punjab National Bank & Anr. Present: None for the appellant,
Learned counsel for the appellant Shri V. D. Chauhan, as he was then, has been elevated as Judge of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, therefore, the registry is directed to issue notice to the appellant within a week for engaging another counsel.
List this case on 01.09.2022 for service.
VN Giri
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Jainam Dormitory
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
VN Giri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court