Citi Bank v. Ami Vishal Pandya
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 40/2021 (CoD)
In Appeal on Diary No. 160/2021
Between
Citi Bank N.A.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Ms. AmiVisal Pandya & Anr.
…Respondent/s
Ms Aparna Jagtap, i/b Mrs Uma Fadia, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 10/11/2022:-
There is no representation for the Appellant.
The defects noted by the office in the application for the substitution consequent to the demise of the second Respondent have not yet been cured.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Citi Bank N.A.
- respondent
Ms. AmiVisal Pandya
- respondent
Anr.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court