Appearing only for respondents, the tribunal directed the appellant to replace the deceased Respondent No.2 by bringing his legal heirs on record and dismissed the petition cause of the appellant. No substantive legal principle was established.
Appellant directed to bring the legal heirs of the deceased Respondent No.2 on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 40/2021 (CoD) In Appeal on Diary No. 160/2021
Between
Citi Bank N.A. … Appellant/s V/s. Ami Vishal Pandya & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms. Uma Fadia, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Ms. Anuradha P. Naik and Mr. Akshaykumar P. Naik, Legal Heir of deceased Respondent No.2 present in person.
-: Order dated: 20/07/2022:-
There is no representation for the Appellant.
Respondent No.1 has appeared through its counsel and has filed an Affidavit in Reply.
Respondent No.2 is reported to be dead. His son Mr. Akshaykumar P. Naik and his wife Ms. Anuradha P. Naik who are Legal Heirs of the Respondent No.2 are present in person.
Appellant is directed to take steps to bring these Legal Heirs on record in place of the deceased Respondent No.2. The Appellant shall take necessary steps within the period of limitation.
Post on 27.09.2022 for steps.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-19
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the deceased Respondent No.2's legal heirs should be brought on record as parties in place of the deceased.
Citi Bank N.A.
Ami Vishal Pandya
Akshaykumar P. Naik
Anuradha P. Naik
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
