The tribunal noted the absence of a reply to an interim application in the underlying miscellaneous appeal. It directed the respondent to file a reply and adjourned the matter for later status.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 123/2022
In Misc. Appeal No. 44/2022
Between
M/s. Dimple Arcade Premises Co-operative … Appellant/s Society Ltd.
V/s.
Union Bank of India & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Harideep Singh, i/b M/s. Clarus Legals, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Abhiraj Rao, i/b M/s. S. K. Singhi & Co, LLP, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated : 06/06/2022 :-
No reply has been filed by Respondents on I.A. No. 123/2022 even after there is a direction dated 09.05.2022 to file reply within two weeks.
The learned counsel for the Respondent No.1 submits that he is ready with reply. Let the reply be filed with application to receive it.
Post on 08.07.2022 for hearing.
Status-quo shall continue till the next date of hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-21
1
M/s. Dimple Arcade Premises Co-operative Society Ltd.
Union Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
