Appellant sought urgent relief in I.A. No. 169/2022. Response was adjourned for reply submission. Status quo maintained till next hearing.
Status quo to be maintained till the date of next hearing on 17/06/2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 169/2022(WoD) In Misc. Appeal No. 60/2022
Between Parvati Sudam Pingale & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda …Respondent/s
Mr. Rohan Chandurkar, i/b Ms. Amita Chaware, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. Puneet Gogad i/b Mr. Sachin N. Fuladi, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
-: Order dated : 03/06/2022 :-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe dated 25.05.2022 filed by Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank seeks time to file reply within a week with copy to other side.
Post on 17.06.2022 for reply/hearing.
Till then status-quo shall maintain.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-3
1
Parvati Sudam Pingale & Ors.
Bank of Baroda
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
