Hdfc Bank v. Naveen Kondal Nalla
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 311 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A. 178 of 2019 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.05.2022 HDFC Bank Limited … Appellant -vsNaveen Kondal Nalla … Respondent Mr. Sonwal Tibrewal, representing Ms. Aparajita Rao, Learned Counsel for Appellant
None for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It is very unfortunate that Mr. Sonwal Tibrewal, Learned Counsel, appears and initially makes a request for adjournment on the ground that Mr. Sumantha, Learned Counsel, from Hyderabad, will argue the matter.
While going through the record, I find there is an order, passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature for the State of Telengana at Hyderabad, in Writ Petition No. 444 of 2022, filed by the Petitioner, the Appellant herein. That writ petition was filed against order dated 22nd June, 2020, passed by Learned DRT, Hyderabad in S.A. 178 of 2019; which is also under challenge in the present appeal as well, wherein the Hon’ble High Court has passed an interim order, staying operation of the impugned order dated 22nd June, 2020. That writ petition was ordered to be listed within six weeks from the date of the order. i.e. 12th April, 2022.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
HDFC Bank Limited
- respondent
Naveen Kondal Nalla
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 191090003112020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court