M/ S Dimple Stone Kresar v. Bank of Baroda and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed for admission to address the omission of the auction purchaser as a party before the Admission Judge.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 571/2022 Date: 20.09.2022
M/s Dimple Stone Kresar Vs. Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Present: Shri R. G. Goswami, counsel for the appellants,
Shri Arun Prakash, Advocate appears on behalf of the Auction Purchaser and submits that although the auction purchaser was party before the Tribunal below, but in the present matter, the auction purchaser has not been made party. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks a week’s time for filing appropriate application in this regard.
List this case on 18.10.2022 for admission.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Dimple Stone Kresar
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090005712022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court