Canara Bank v. Nancy Sehgal and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Canara Bank v. Nancy Sehgal and Anr.; RFA(COMM) 542/2024 dismissed as withdrawn with permission (CM APPL. 26079/2026); Authorized Representative substitution (Chitra Prakash Bansiwal, Emp. No.86156) allowed in both RFA(COMM) 542/2024 (CM APPL. 27082/2026) and RFA(COMM) 543/2024 (CM APPL. 27347/2026); Delhi High Court, 24.04.2026, Bench: Anil Kshetarpal and Amit Mahajan, JJ.; no merits adjudication; no statutory provisions or precedents discussed; Respondents represented by Shashank Dixit (CGSC) and Kunal Raj in RFA(COMM) 542/2024, none listed in RFA(COMM) 543/2024.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw RFA(COMM) 542/2024 granted and the appeal dismissed as withdrawn; substitution of Ms. Chitra Prakash Bansiwal as Authorized Representative of Canara Bank allowed in both RFA(COMM) 542/2024 (CM APPL. 27082/2026) and RFA(COMM) 543/2024 (CM APPL. 27347/2026). RFA(COMM) 543/2024 itself is not finally decided by this order.