Canara Bank v. Nancy Sehgal and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural order, High Court of Delhi, 24.04.2026, in RFA(COMM) 542/2024 and RFA(COMM) 543/2024 (Canara Bank v. Nancy Sehgal and Anr.). Coram: Anil Kshetarpal and Amit Mahajan, JJ. Held: (i) substitution of Authorized Representative allowed in both appeals, Ms. Chitra Prakash Bansiwal substituted as AR of Canara Bank; (ii) RFA(COMM) 542/2024 dismissed as withdrawn on the Bank's application. No merits adjudication; no statutes or precedents cited; no monetary reliefs. Respondents unrepresented in RFA(COMM) 543/2024. Useful only for citation-history/procedural-status purposes, not for precedent.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw RFA(COMM) 542/2024 granted; the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Substitution applications CM APPL. 27082/2026 and CM APPL. 27347/2026 allowed, with Ms. Chitra Prakash Bansiwal (Emp. No.86156) substituted as Authorized Representative of the Appellant Bank. The main appeal in RFA(COMM) 543/2024 was not disposed of by this order.