Petitioner sought extension for concluding arbitration under Section 29A. Respondent opposed nothing. Court extended time by twelve months from the date of order.
Extended the time period for conclusion of arbitration proceedings by twelve months from today.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~74
CNR No. DLHC010404502026
versus
IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chandan Kumar & Mr. Vikram Sharma, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
AUGUST 31, 2026 Ch
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2026 at 12:28:06
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the time period for concluding arbitration proceedings should be extended given no objection from the respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S APEX BUILDSYS LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS M/S ERA BUILDSYS LTD.)
IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
AVNEESH JHINGAN
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
