Allowed

Ramesh Kumar Ranaik v. M/S Shyam Indus Power Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC25 Aug 2026O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/680/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought further extension of the sole arbitrator's mandate under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Respondent had no objection. Court extended the mandate for six months based on party consensus while disputing evidence was concluded.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator extended for a further period of six months to conclude proceedings and render award.

Ramesh Kumar Ranaik Vs M/S Shyam Indus Power Solutions Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~63

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CNR No. DLHC010400232026

¶4

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 680/2026

¶5

RAMESH KUMAR RANAIK .....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Ms. Suhasini Sen, Mr. Rahul Kripalani, Ms. Rayana Mukherjee, Ms. Aeshva Salwan and Mr. Sista Srinivas, Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

M/S SHYAM INDUS POWER SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD

¶9

.....Respondent

¶10

Through: Mr. Aman Gupta and Mr. Divyam Kandhani, Advocates.

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

¶12

ORDER (ORAL)

¶13

% 25.08.2026

¶14

I.A. 23349/2026 (Exemption from filing certified copies)

¶15

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶16

The application stands disposed of.

¶17

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 680/2026

¶18

The present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996¹ seeking further extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator by six months.

¶19

The mandate of the learned Tribunal was initially extended by mutual consent of the parties under Section 29A(3) of the Act till

¶20

1 “Act” hereinafter

¶21

Signature Not Verified

¶22

Signed By:GUNN O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 680/2026 Signing Date:25.08.2026 19:24:01

¶23

Page 63 of 2

¶24

10.12.2025. Thereafter, this Court, vide order dated 11.02.2026, further extended the mandate for a period of 6 months.

¶25

In regard to the stage of the proceedings, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the pleadings are complete, evidence of both sides has been concluded, and the matter is presently at the stage of final arguments.

¶26

6. Issue notice.

¶27

Notice is accepted by Mr. Aman Gupta, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent.

¶28

Learned Counsel for the Respondent has no objection to the extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator.

¶29

In view of the consensus between the parties, the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator is extended for a further period of six months to conclude the arbitral proceedings and render the award. The period till the date of the present order is also regularised.

¶30

The learned Sole Arbitrator shall endeavour to conclude the proceedings and render the award within the extended period.

¶31

The present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶32

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J

¶33

AUGUST 25, 2026/pa

¶34

Signature Not Verified

¶35

Signed By:GUNN O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 680/2026 Signing Date:25.08.2026 19:24:01

¶36

Page 64 of 2

Ramesh Kumar Ranaik v. M/S Shyam Indus Power Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar Ranaik v. M/S Shyam Indus Power Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Awfis Space Solutions Ltd. Vs Ruby Infotech

M/S Dimple Theatre & Ors. Vs M/S Jop International Limited

Naysa Vas India Communications Private Limited Vs Bharti Airtel Limited

R K Bararia through Shri R K Bararia Prop Vs Jbm Global School

Mr. Monty Vs Sr. Dcm., Northern Railway, Delhi Division

H and K Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Shiv Nadar Foundation

M/S Apex Buildsys Limited (Previously Known as M/S Era Buildsys Ltd.) Vs Ircon International Limited

H and K Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Shiv Nadar Foundation