Single judge order extending arbitration time limit by six months under Section 29A upon respondent's consent, disposing of the petition.
Time period for conclusion of proceedings extended by six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
CNR No. DLHC010326962026
MANGLOOR HIGHWAYS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Samiron Borkataky, Mr. Ikshvaaku Marwah & Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advs.
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Subash Bhat & Mr. Nikita Sharma, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
O R D E R % 01.09.2026
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
SEPTEMBER 1, 2026/‘ha’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2026 at 12:28:14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the time period for concluding arbitration proceedings should be extended?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MANGLOOR HIGHWAYS PRIVATE LIMITED
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
AVNEESH JHINGAN
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
