Petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of time to conclude arbitration proceedings. The respondent raised no serious objection, and the court extended the period by four months and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
SMVD INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajeev Ahuja, Mr. Shikhar Bansal and Mr. Harshit Ahuja, Advs.
versus
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Singhal and Mr. P. Singhal, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2026/Pa
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 13:00:32
1 issue framed by the court
Should the statutory period under Section 29A for concluding arbitration proceedings be extended?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMVD Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd.
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
