Ms Gaijin Fitness India v. House of Fitness Private. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court disposed of an appeal against an interim order restraining the appellant from using a trademark. The court accepted a settlement agreement dated 15 June 2026, where the appellant paid Rs. 8,00,000 to the respondent, and allowed the settlement to bind the parties.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was disposed of as settled; the settlement agreement was recorded and the parties were bound by its terms.