Trademark suit for permanent injunction against use of the JINDAL mark was settled through mediation. Defendants agreed to display 'SOURABH' and 'JINDAL' in equal font size, style and colour and to suffer an injunction decree. Suit decreed in terms of specified plaint prayers, court fees refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~140
JINDAL STAINLESS (HISAR) LTD. .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Rohil Bansal and Mr. Chirayu Prahlad, Advocates.
versus
SOURABH JINAL & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Birender Bhatt and Mr. Aditya Katyayan, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 15.05.2026
CS(COMM) 247/2019
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 11:38:15
JYOTI SINGH, J
MAY 15, 2026 S.Sharma
CS(COMM) 247/2019
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 11:38:15
1 issue framed by the court
Should the suit for injunction over use of the JINDAL mark be decreed in terms of the parties' settlement?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jindal Stainless (Hisar) Ltd.
Sourabh Jinal
Ors.
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
