Disposed

Radico Khaitan Ltd. v. Superior Industries Ltd.

Delhi HC18 May 2026CS(COMM)/885/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Trademark infringement and passing off suit over JHOOMAR/JHOOM marks in Class 33 was settled through mediation. Court found the settlement lawful and decreed the suit in terms of plaint paragraphs 55(i)-(iv), refunding court fees to plaintiff and disposing of pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed per plaint paras 55(i)-(iv); settlement forms part of decree; refund of entire court fees; pending applications disposed.

Radico Khaitan Ltd. Vs Superior Industries Ltd. — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~37

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 885/2024, I.A. 41744/2024 & I.A. 45920/2024

¶4

RADICO KHAITAN LTD .....Plaintiff

¶5

Through: Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Ms. Ishani Chandra, Ms. Srijan Uppal, Mr. Abhishek Bhati, Mr. Abhigyan Pandey and Mr. Siddhant Sekri, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Defendant Through: Mr. Bhuvneshwar Tyagi, Advocate.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 18.05.2026

¶12

This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff inter alia seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, exporting, advertising, marketing and/or in any manner using, directly or indirectly, in relation to any alcoholic beverages/country liquor and/or any allied and

¶13

cognate goods under the impugned marks /JHOOMAR and

¶14

and/or any other identical/deceptively similar marks to

¶15

CS(COMM) 885/2024

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 15:52:14

¶19

Plaintiff’s /JHOOM marks amounting to infringement of Plaintiff’s registered mark in Class 33 as also passing off.

¶20

During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred for mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where they have amicably settled their inter se disputes and executed a Settlement Agreement dated 17.03.2026, incorporating the terms of the settlement. Copy of the Settlement Agreement has been taken on record. As per the Settlement Agreement, Defendant has agreed to suffer permanent injunction and Plaintiff has agreed to give up reliefs of damages, delivery up and rendition of accounts.

¶21

Court has perused the terms of the settlement and finds the same to be lawful.

¶22

Accordingly, the suit is decreed in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant in terms of paragraph 55(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of the plaint based on the settlement between the parties, terms of which shall form a part of the decree and bind the parties thereto.

¶23

Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet.

¶24

Suit is disposed of along with the pending applications.

¶25

Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with Court Fees Act, 1870.

JYOTI SINGH, J

MAY 18, 2026/ RW

CS(COMM) 885/2024

Page 2 of 2

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 15:52:14

Radico Khaitan Ltd. v. Superior Industries Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radico Khaitan Ltd. v. Superior Industries Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dominos Ip Holder Llc & Anr. Vs Mr Kapil Kumar & Ors.

Winzo Games Private Limited Vs Redseer Strategy Consultants Private Limited

Hero Investcorp Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs Ashok Kumar (John Doe)

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited Vs Mr Jagmohan, Proprietor of M/S Blues Collection

Antara Senior Living Limited Vs Horizon Promoters India Ltd.

Nehru Place Hotels Private Limited Vs Interbix Club House Private Limited & Ors.

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Vs Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd. & Anr.

Education Today Vs Vasant Valley Concept School & Ors.

Rayner Surgical Ireland Limited Previously Omeros Corporation Vs the Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs

Mr Rahul Mehta & Anr. Vs Delhi Development Authority

Winzo Games Private Limited Vs Redseer Strategy Consultants Private Limited

Neurocentria Inc. Vs Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs

Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs Chembott Chemicals and Pharmaceutical Private Limited and Anr.

Tirth Agro Technology Private Limited Vs Shree Bhawani Agro Industries