Writ petition disposed of on the State's submission that the petitioner's prayer can be reconsidered under a policy dated 16.07.2004; respondent directed to pass a speaking order and the impugned order was set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
AAS MOHD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Utkarsh singh, Advocate.
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari(ASC), Mr. Alok Sharma, Mr. Pavitra Dixit, Advs. for State.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 10.07.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 10, 2026/P
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:13:24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's case should be reconsidered by the respondent in terms of the policy dated 16.07.2004?
Aas Mohd
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
