Mamta v. the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bare two-paragraph disposal order: no issue framed, no statute or precedent cited, no relief granted, no quantum involved. Petitioner appeared through none; the State (NCT of Delhi) was represented through Mr. Abhinav Kumar and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. for Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel. Of limited citational value beyond evidencing the bare outcome of this particular writ petition.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner's grievance appears to have been mitigated, as the private individual against whom it was raised is in jail. ¶9