Petitioner's counsel stated the relief sought had been satisfied; the Delhi High Court disposed of the criminal writ petition and pending applications as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
ANTO JOSEPH .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Gayatri Virmani, Advocate
versus
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE DELHI .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Priyatam Bhardwaj, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
% 10.03.2026
DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
MARCH 10, 2026/ns/ GJ
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 14:01:25
Anto Joseph
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Delhi
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
