Dismissed¶¶11
Irfan & Ors. v. the State through SHO Ps Mundka Outer District Delhi & Anr. & Ors.
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./3158/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissal for non-prosecution due to petitioners' absence at consecutive hearings; CRL.M.C. 3158/2024; High Court of Delhi; Irfan & Ors. v. State through SHO PS Mundka (Outer District Delhi); respondent side represented by APP Mr. Digam Singh Dagar; single-judge order by Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma dated 10.03.2026; no statutes, precedents, or quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution because no one represented the petitioners when the case was taken up, and they had likewise failed to appear on the last hearing date, indicating they were not interested in pursuing the petition. ¶¶11