Petitioner sought quashing of FIR for offences under Section 420 IPC and Section 24 of the Emigration Act based on a settlement between the parties. Counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition after partly arguing, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
Through: Mr. Akhil, Advocate.
versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
MARCH 9, 2026/ ry
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2026 at 11:02:22
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rahul Sood
The State of NCT of Delhi
Anr.
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
