Three criminal writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous after counsel for the petitioners submitted that a cancellation report had been filed and accepted by the concerned court, leaving nothing to adjudicate. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the petitions on that ground.
Writ petitions disposed of as infructuous
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62 to 64
CNR No. DLHC010693342024
Through: Mr. Rajat Agnihotri, Advocate (VC)
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given)
CNR No. DLHC010754162024
Through: Mr. Rajat Agnihotri, Advocate (VC)
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given)
CNR No. DLHC010769692024
Through: Mr. Deepank Yadav, Advocate.
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:52:52
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 16.09.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2026 / tr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:52:52
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions have become infructuous following the cancellation report and its acceptance by the concerned court?
Nitesh Bhardwaj
Delhi Apartments Pvt Ltd
Hitesh Bhardwaj
Directorate of Enforcement
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
