Three criminal writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous after a cancellation report was accepted by the concerned court, rendering further adjudication unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62 to 64
CNR No. DLHC010693342024
Through: Mr. Rajat Agnihotri, Advocate (VC)
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given)
CNR No. DLHC010754162024
Through: Mr. Rajat Agnihotri, Advocate (VC)
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given)
CNR No. DLHC010769692024
Through: Mr. Deepank Yadav, Advocate.
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:52:53
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 16.09.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2026 / tr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:52:53
Nitesh Bhardwaj
Directorate of Enforcement
Delhi Apartments Pvt Ltd
Directorate of Enforcement
Hitesh Bhardwaj
Directorate of Enforcement
Purusha Indra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
