Petitioner sought quashing of FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 via constitutional writ. Counsel withdrew the petition to pursue discharge on merits later. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~118
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010398012026
versus
THE STATE AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 24.08.2026
PRATEEK JALAN, J
AUGUST 24, 2026/ “B”/KA/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 16:04:34
Kartik Sharma
The State
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
