Petition by a prisoner in judicial custody seeking specialist medical treatment from AIIMS within jail premises was not decided on merits; the State agreed to treat it as a representation to the Jail Superintendent to decide within two weeks, and the petition was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
ASHOK KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Chetan Bhardwaj, Adv. (Through VC)
versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advs. SI- Dipka, PS: Adarsh Nagar
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2026 at 11:47:31
of two weeks .
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
JULY 01, 2026/Ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2026 at 11:47:31
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ashok Kumar
State GNCT of Delhi
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
