Writ petition seeking directions for expeditious disposal of a revision petition pending six years against an order framing charges under Sections 420/406/120B IPC. Court disposed of the petition requesting the revisional court to decide the revision preferably within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~95
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Mr. Nitish Dhawan and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates. SI Sanjay Meena.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(CRL) 1629/2026 1
Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 1.05.2026 17:01:51
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
MAY 20, 2026/ss/pb
W.P.(CRL) 1629/2026 2
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 1.05.2026 17:01:51
1 issue framed by the court
Should the revisional court be directed to conclude and dispose of the pending revision petition against the charge order in a time-bound manner?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arpita Chatterjee
State of NCT of Delhi
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
