Writ petitions concerning FIR No.401/2019, PS Vikas Puri, were disposed of as infructuous since the FIR had already been quashed by the Delhi High Court in Crl.M.C. 2576/2026 by order dated 07.04.2026.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43 and 44
PURAN CHAND KAUSHAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aman Panwar, Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Mr. Manav Kaushil and Ms. Rishika Chaudhary, Advs.
Versus
STATE (N.C.T) OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr. Alok Sharma, Adv. SI-Pradeep Kr., PS: Vikas Puri
44
W.P.(CRL) 2131/2022, CRL.M.A. 18370/2022, CRL.M.A. 18371/2022
RAMESHWARI DEVI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aman Panwar, Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Mr. Manav Kaushil and Ms. Rishika Chaudhary, Advs.
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr. Alok Sharma, Adv. SI-Pradeep Kr., PS: Vikas Puri
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 08.04.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2026 at 12:44:40
registered at PS: Vikas Puri involved in the present proceedings has already been quashed by this Court in Crl.M.C. 2576/2026 vide order dated 07.04.2026, the present petitions have become infructuous.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
APRIL 8, 2026/Ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2026 at 12:44:40
Puran Chand Kaushal
State (N.C.T) of Delhi
Rameshwari Devi
State (NCT of Delhi)
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
