Convict sought a writ directing release on a third two-week furlough. The State undertook to decide his pending representation before the jail authority within two weeks; the court disposed of the petition on that statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC Insp. Rajesh Verma, PS: Narela
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R
% 10.04.2026
SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
APRIL 10, 2026/Ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 12:22:34
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sanjay
The State of NCT of Delhi
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
