Dismissed¶3

Vinod Kumar v. Gudiya

Delhi HC10 Apr 2026CRL.REV.P.(MAT.)/191/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court order dated 10.04.2026 by Justice Saurabh Banerjee; CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 191/2026 and CRL.M.A. 10963/2026-Stay; Vinod Kumar v. Gudiya; petition under Ss.438/442 read with S.528 BNSS 2023 against interim maintenance order dated 13.01.2026 in Mt No.651/2024 (Family Court North-East, Karkardooma); dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to initiate appropriate steps if and when required; interim order shelf life; affidavits of income awaited; trial pending; no counsel for respondent.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal as withdrawn of the petition and the pending stay application, with liberty to initiate appropriate steps, if as and when required. ¶3

Vinod Kumar Vs Gudiya — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~45

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 191/2026, CRL.M.A. 10963/2026-Stay

¶4

VINOD KUMAR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. M. Hasibuddin, Ms. Ruhani Sahanu and Mr. Rithik Gullaiya, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

GUDIYA .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶8

O R D E R % 10.04.2026

¶9

By virtue of the present petition under Section 438/442 read with 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ) the petitioner seeks setting aside the interim maintenance order dated 13.01.2026 passed in Mt No.651/2024 by the learned Principal Judge Family Court (North-East), Karkardooma Court, Delhi, in case titled as “ Gudiya & Ors Vs. Vinod Kumar ”.

¶10

In view of the fact that the impugned order fixing the maintenance is an interim order and the parties are yet to be relegated to trial for recording their respective evidences therein and examination of witnesses, and the final adjudication thereon will only be possible after their respective affidavits of income of the parties are filed, as also since the impugned order has a shelf life and is dependent upon the final outcome thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner after some arguments seeks to

¶11

This is a digitally signed order.

¶12

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 11:40:04

¶13

withdraw the present petition with liberty to initiate appropriate steps, if as and when required.

¶14

As such, the present petition alongwith the pending application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶15

SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

¶16

APRIL 10, 2026/So

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 11:40:04

Vinod Kumar v. Gudiya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar v. Gudiya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas Shokeen @ Vicky Vs State of (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Ajay Kumar and Ors. Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Nikhil Vs State through SHO Ps Paschim Vihar

Brahm Singh Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Himanshu Dhawan Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Pragyaveer Kumar & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.