Petitioners sought quashing of a cyber police station FIR for offences under Sections 419/420 IPC. The State stated investigation was nearly complete and the offences compoundable. Counsel did not press the petition, reserving liberty to seek permission to compound after charge-sheet filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~90
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Abhinav Kumar and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates with SI Naresh, PS Cyber Cell
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
%
10.04.2026
MANOJ JAIN, J
APRIL 10, 2026/st/sa
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 12:22:25
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No. 51/2023 under Sections 419/420 IPC be quashed?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Rocky Khatri
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
