Contempt petition alleging defiance of an interim arbitration order was dismissed in default for non-prosecution after repeated non-appearance by petitioners and non-filing of process fee.
None granted; petition dismissed in default for non-prosecution and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
Through: None.
MADAN MOHAN ROY & ORS .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
Courts Act, 1971 seeks the following prayers: -
“(a) initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondents / Contemnors and hold them guilty of contempt of the Hon'ble Court for deliberately and contumaciously defying the order dated 22nd May 2018 passed by the Hon'ble Court in O.M.P. (I) (COMM) No. 213 of 2018 titled "Rattan Polychem Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Reliable Insupacks Pvt. Ltd."; and
(b) give such other punishment to the Respondents/Contemnors as this. Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case; and
(c) pass such other or further order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and necessary to sub-serve the ends of justice.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2026 at 11:38:02
process fee.
AMIT SHARMA, J
APRIL 6, 2026/ kr/sg
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2026 at 11:38:02
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RATTAN POLYCHAM PVT LTD & ANR
MADAN MOHAN ROY & ORS
AMIT SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
