Tenant's revision against eviction order and refusal of leave to defend was dismissed in default after possession was handed over and no one appeared on consecutive hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
Through: None. versus SMT SEEMA DEVI KHANDELWAL .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 02.04.2026
“1. To call for the records of the Eviction Petition no. RC /ARC/ 397/2021 titled as "Seema Devi Khandelwal Vs. Kali Charan Saini" and to peruse the same;
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 12:21:43
“1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/ tenant through video conferencing submits that the tenant is unable to pay the user and occupation charges @ Rs.800/- per month with effect from 19.03.2023 in terms of the earlier order, and, therefore the affidavit in compliance of the last order has not been filed.
AMIT SHARMA, J
APRIL 2, 2026/bsr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 12:21:43
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sh Kali Charan Saini
Smt Seema Devi Khandelwal
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
