Contempt petition concerning alleged occupation of property beyond the period allowed in a prior RFA order; petitioner sought leave to withdraw with liberty to claim damages/rent, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with such liberty granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
O R D E R % 03.02.2026
SACHIN DATTA, J
FEBRUARY 3, 2026/uk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 12:03:27
1 issue framed by the court
Should the contempt petition be withdrawn with liberty to pursue damages/rent for the respondent's continued occupation beyond the period envisaged in the order dated 13.09.2023 in RFA No. 686/2023?
Komal Arora
M/S Zeelab Pharmacy Pvt. Ltd.
Anr
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
