Dismissed¶26

M/S Entasis India Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr. Rajan Bajaj, Director M/S Medisphere Marketing Ltd.

Delhi HC6 Apr 2026CONT.CAS(C)/362/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi HC contempt petition CONT.CAS(C) 362/2014, M/s Entasis India Pvt Ltd v Rajan Bajaj (Director, M/s Medisphere Marketing Ltd), dismissed in default for non-prosecution on 06.04.2026 by Justice Amit Sharma; sought enforcement of undertaking and order dated 08.01.2014 in CS(OS) 1981/2011 under Ss. 2(b) & 12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971; dormant since 2014, sine-die adjournment 26.10.2017, warrants open, no appearance by petitioner on CFCM-driven relisting.

What did the court decide?

The present petition is dismissed in default for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly. ¶26

M/S Entasis India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr. Rajan Bajaj, Director M/S… — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~41

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 362/2014

¶4

M/S ENTASIS INDIA PVT. LTD .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: None.

¶6

versus

¶7

MR. RAJAN BAJAJ, DIRECTOR M/S MEDISPHERE MARKETING LTD .....Respondent

¶8

Through:

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 06.04.2026

¶13

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶14

The present petition under Sections 2(b) and 12 of the Contempt of

¶15

Courts Act, 1971 seeks the following prayers:-

¶16

“a) punish the contemnor for his contemptuous act of willful disobedience of their own undertaking dated 08.01.2014 as well as the order dated 08.01.2014 passed by this Hon’ble Court in CS (OS) No. 1981/2011;

¶17

b) punitive cost of litigation may be imposed against the contemnor and in favour of the petitioner;

¶18

c) pass such other and further order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”

¶19

Vide order dated 26.10.2017, the following order was passed by learned Predecessor Bench: -

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2026 at 11:38:07

¶22

“SI Amit Dutt appears from PS Lajpat Nagar and has handed over a report on the bailable warrants issued. As per the report, the respondent could not be traced at the given address. Petition is pending since the year 2014 awaiting service. It cannot be allowed to be adjourned from time to time indefinitely, unless, the petitioner equally makes efforts for tracing the respondent and furnish fresh and the correct address. Petition is therefore, adjourned sine die, to be revived, as and when, the petitioner finds fresh and the correct address of the petitioner. It is however, made clear that the warrants issued shall remain open to be executed by the police for the respondent being produced before the Court.”

¶23

The matter was listed in view of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Case Flow Management Committee of this Court on 19.02.2026, and accordingly, Court notice was issued to the petitioner, and the same stood served.

¶24

None appears on behalf of the petitioner today.

¶25

The present petition is dismissed in default for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly.

¶26

Pending application (s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶27

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith.

¶28

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶29

APRIL 6, 2026/ nk

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2026 at 11:38:07

M/S Entasis India Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr. Rajan Bajaj, Director M/S Medisphere Marketing Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Entasis India Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr. Rajan Bajaj, Director M/S Medisphere Marketing Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nain Singh Vs Alok Joshi & Anr.

G. Anand and Ors. Vs Sh. Govind Mohan and Anr.

Jagdish & Anr. Vs Arun Kumar Jha & Anr.

Manmood Shankar Vs Jp Bajaj, Zonal Manager, LIC and Anr.

Om Udyog Vs Parmod Kumar

Jitender Jain Vs Umesh Chand Jain & Ors.

Poonam Sharma @ Pinki & Anr. Vs Vivek Sharma

Satvir & Anr. Vs Surender Singh

Nain Singh Vs Alok Joshi & Anr.

M/S. Mohit Liquors Vs M/S. Beam Global Spirits and Wine (India) P. Ltd.

Sh Kali Charan Saini Vs Smt Seema Devi Khandelwal

Indrawati Vs Amit Kumar

Smt Suman Bharti Vs Shri Karam Chand

Rajesh Kumar Vs Omvir Shokin & Anr.