Askar Microns P Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition alleged wilful disobedience of an earlier Division Bench direction requiring issuance of a speaking order. The court accepted that the respondents had already issued a speaking order and therefore found no further orders necessary, while preserving the petitioner’s right to seek lawful remedies if aggrieved by that order.
What did the court decide?
The petition and pending application were disposed of with no further orders, leaving the petitioner at liberty to seek remedies in accordance with law if aggrieved by the speaking order.