A petition alleging wilful disobedience of a judgment was dismissed on the record. The court held that since the impugned judgment was later set aside by a Division Bench, no directions were required and the petition was disposed of accordingly.
No enforcement directions required; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
CNR No. DLHC010360772023
RUKHSANA BANO & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: None. Versus ASHWANI KUMAR & ORS. …..Respondents Through: Mr. Shaurya Tyagi, Advocate for Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil), GNCTD
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 31.08.2026
This matter is taken up today as 27th August, 2026, was declared as a Local Holiday.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2026 at 14:10:54
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
AUGUST 31, 2026 ak
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2026 at 14:10:54
Rukhsana Bano & Ors.
Ashwani Kumar & Ors.
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
