Petitioner sought to withdraw a contempt petition after some arguments, with liberty to approach the Arbitrator. The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the liberty sought and disposed of the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~115
Through: Mr. Mayank Arora with Mr. Sarthak Mittal, Advocates.
versus
SANJAY SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Alok Singh and Ms. Nitika Jangir, Advocates for respondent nos. 1, 3 and 5. (M): 9467805799
Email: [email protected] Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ekta Sukhramani, Advocates for respondent no. 2. (M): 9891283123 Email: [email protected]
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R
% 09.07.2026 CONT.CAS(C) 1145/2026
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 16:09:08
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
JULY 9, 2026 c
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 16:09:08
Nitin Gupta
Sanjay Singh
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
