Petitioner sought directions for expedited disposal of an eviction petition and orders on leave to defend application. The court noted the matter was already fixed for orders before the trial court and held it inappropriate to pass any directions at that stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
Through: Ms. Farhat Jahan Rehmani, Mr. Imran Ahmad, Ms. Fatima Parveen and Ms. Muskan Ali, Advocates.
versus
ISHWAR CHAND .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R
% 17.04.2026
CM APPL. 25226/2026 (for exemption)
“(a) PASS APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS FOR EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL OF EVICTION PETITION TITLED AS "MAMTA VERMA VS. ISHWAR CHAND, BEARING RC ARC NO.124/2023, PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF MS.CHARU ASIWAL, LD. ACJ/ARC, SHAHDARA, KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI AND ALSO DIRECTLD. A RC TO PASS ORDERS ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO DEFEND AND SUBSQUENT EVENTS ON THE DATE ALREADY FIXED i.e. 12.05.2026”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 14:32:41
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
APRIL 17, 2026/ v/ik
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 14:32:41
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should issue for expeditious disposal of an eviction petition pending before the trial court.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mamta Verma
Ishwar Chand
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
