Petitioner sought directions for expeditious disposal of a pending eviction petition. The court held the trial court was proceeding per its own board considering pendency and age of cases, and it was not appropriate to issue time-bound directions. Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
MAMTA VERMA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Farhat Jahan Rehmani, Mr. Imran Ahmadand Ms. Muskan Ali, Advs.
versus
VIPIN KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R
%
20.04.2026
CM APPL. 25735/2026 (for Exemption)
CM(M) 878/2026
“(a) pass appropriate directions for expeditious disposal of eviction petition titled as "Mamta Verma Vs. Vipin Kumar, being RCARC NO.126/2023, pending before the court of Ms. Pragati, Ld. SCJ/RC, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi and hear arguments on leave to defend application and application under Section 151 CPC for subsequent events filed by the respondent, in the Eviction Petition titled as RC ARC No. 126/2023 titled as Mamta Verma Vs. Vipin Kumar on the date already fixed i.e.19.05.2026.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/04/2026 at 11:40:47
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
APRIL 20, 2026/ sds /ik
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/04/2026 at 11:40:47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the trial court to expedite disposal of the pending eviction petition and hear the leave to defend application on a fixed date.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mamta Verma
Vipin Kumar
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
