Mohd Asif v. Mr Syed Tahir Ali & Ors.

Delhi HC20 Apr 2026CM(M)/868/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mohd Asif v. Syed Tahir Ali & Ors., CM(M) 868/2026 (with CM APPLs. 25567-25569/2026), Delhi High Court, decided 20.04.2026 by Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. Article 227 petition against Trial Court order dated 21.01.2026 closing defendant No. 2's evidence in CS DJ No. 258/2015 (14643/2016); petition held infructuous and disposed of after the Trial Court disposed of the suit by judgment dated 18.04.2026; no ruling on the merits of the impugned order; no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

None; petition disposed of as infructuous in view of the Trial Court's disposal of the underlying suit, with all pending applications also disposed of. ¶¶23

Mohd Asif Vs Mr Syed Tahir Ali & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~59

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CM(M) 868/2026, CM APPL. 25567/2026, CM APPL. 25568/2026 & CM APPL. 25569/2026

¶4

MOHD ASIF .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Ramesh Saraf, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

MR SYED TAHIR ALI & ORS. .....Respondents

¶8

Through: Mohd. Anis Ur Rehman, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Ms. Jhuma Bose, Advocate for R-3.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

¶10

O R D E R % 20.04.2026

¶11

This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the impugned order dated 21^st January, 2026, passed by the learned Trial Court in CS DJ No. 258/2015 14643/2016 , whereby the evidence of the petitioner/defendant No. 2 has been closed.

¶13

Learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 appear on advance notice and accept notice.

¶14

Learned Counsel for the respondents submits that the present petition has become infructuous and also places on record a copy of the order dated 18^th April, 2026, passed by the learned Trial Court, whereby the suit has been disposed of. A copy of the said order has been supplied to learned Counsel for

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/04/2026 at 11:41:03

¶17

the petitioner.

¶18

Let the matter be called again at 02:30 PM.

¶19

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J

¶20

APRIL 20, 2026/ MR/ABK

¶21

At 2:50 P.M.

¶22

Nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

¶23

Since the suit has already been disposed of vide judgment dated 18^th April, 2026, so the present petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. All the pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of.

¶24

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J

¶25

APRIL 20, 2026/ MR/ABK

¶26

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/04/2026 at 11:41:03

Mohd Asif v. Mr Syed Tahir Ali & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Asif v. Mr Syed Tahir Ali & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Komal Gola Vs Dinker Dev Handa

Rashmi Gulati Vs S Harjeet Singh

Mohan Elastic Pvt. Ltd. Vs Smt Sunita Gupta and Anr.

M/S N.E. Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Earth Eco Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Ramesh Tiwari Vs Amit Agarwal

Akshay Pihal Vs Meenakshi & Anr.

Raj Kumar Upadhyay Vs Tirupati Work Space Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Vichitra Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Taurant Projects Ltd.

Rashmi Gulati Vs S Harjeet Singh

Ricom Infratech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Union of India through the Secretary Banking & Ors.

Mohan Elastic Pvt. Ltd. Vs Smt Sunita Gupta and Anr.

Ashok Kumar Vs Amanjeet Singh & Anr.

Janki Devi Vs Anita & Ors.

Richa Jha Vs Capriso Finance Limited