Premair, a Unit of Afimac Associates Private Limited v. Heritage Aviation Private Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court order dated 17.04.2026 in CM(M) 856/2026 (with CM APPL. 25216/2026), Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. Petitioner: Premair, a unit of Afimac Associates Private Limited (adv. Aryan Arora); Respondent: Heritage Aviation Private Limited (advs. Jasmine Damkewala, Vaishali Sharma, Divyam Khera, Anusha Misra). Article 227 petition seeking time-bound pronouncement of judgment on a pending Section 34 petition (OMP (COMM.) No. 94 of 2023) before the District Judge (Commercial Court)-02, Patiala House Courts, and a bar on adjournments for re-opening arguments. Court refused to interfere with the trial court's board scheduling, citing pendency and age of cases; petition disposed of. Useful for: judicial restraint in issuing expedition directions under Article 227; no relief granted.
What did the court decide?
The Court declined to issue any direction to the learned Trial Court for expeditious disposal or time-bound decision of the pending Section 34 petition, since the Trial Court is proceeding with matters in accordance with its own board, keeping in view the pendency and age of cases before it.