Respondents' counsel reported a settlement, with possession of the subject premises delivered to respondent no. 1's legal representatives on 31 December 2025, making the petition infructuous. As no one appeared for the petitioner on recall, the petition was dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
Through: None.
versus
BRIJ BEHARI SHARAN AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Poonam, Adv. (through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
JANUARY 12, 2026/ v/tp
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
JANUARY 12, 2026/ sds / tp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/01/2026 at 12:24:26
Prem Nath
Brij Behari Sharan
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
