Disposed
Everest Enterprises P.Ltd. v. M.C.D.
Delhi HCCM(M)/1207/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition disposed of as infructuous on the petitioner's own submission that it had become infructuous; pending applications also disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~1
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CM(M) 1207/2007 & CM APPL. 12076/2007 EVEREST ENTERPRISES P.LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Srikant Shingh, Advocates. versus M.C.D. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Geetanjali Reddy, Advocate (through VC) for Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, SC and Mr. Siddhartha Goswami and Mr. Aditya Sachdeva, Advocates.
¶4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
¶5
O R D E R
¶6
- % 09.01.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.
¶7
- Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous, so it be disposed of.
¶8
- Keeping in view of submissions, the present petition is disposed of as it become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
¶9
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
¶10
JANUARY 9, 2026 V/abk
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Everest Enterprises P. Ltd.
- respondent
M.C.D.
Coram
AI extract
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court