Two petitions concerning parties in a suit at final-argument stage were withdrawn at counsel's request and disposed of as withdrawn, with pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30 & 31
Through: Mr. S C Sagar, Mr. Naeem Ahmed, Mr. Shishupal Sharma and Ms. Swati, Advocates.
versus
HIMANSHU SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ishan Jain, Advocate.
31
versus
HIMANSHU SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ishan Jain, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R % 06.04.2026
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
APRIL 6, 2026/ nd/ik
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2026 at 11:35:17
Ray of Abundantia previously known as the Saffron Tree & Anr.
Himanshu Sharma
M/s. Ray of Abundantia and Anr through its partner Ms. Deepti Kurup
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
