Petition under Article 227 became infructuous as the underlying suit was withdrawn before the Trial Court; petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
ANUBHAV SINGH
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
versus
POONAM SEHGAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shantnu Aggarwal, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R
% 02.04.2026
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
APRIL 2, 2026/ nd/abk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:13:06
Anubhav Singh
Poonam Sehgal
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
