Dismissed¶20

Vikas @ Vicky v. State, NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC6 Apr 2026BAIL APPLN./720/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vikas @ Vicky; BAIL APPLN. 720/2025; CRL.M.A.5169/2025; Delhi High Court; Girish Kathpalia; 06.04.2026; regular bail dismissed as withdrawn; FIR No. 235/2021 PS Lajpat Nagar; Sections 376/376D/506 IPC; Sections 4/6 POCSO Act; rape of minor prosecutrix; liberty to file afresh before trial court; change in circumstances; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh before the trial court in view of change in circumstances. ¶20

Vikas @ Vicky Vs State, NCT of Delhi — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 720/2025 & CRL.M.A.5169/2025

¶4

VIKAS @ VICKY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aakash Kumar, Advocate ( through video conferencing )

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE, NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent

¶7

Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Suruchi.

¶8

Mr. Gaurav Sharma, DHCLSC Advocate for victim.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 06.04.2026

¶11

The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 235/2021 of PS Lajpat Nagar for offence under Section 376/376D/506 IPC and 4/6 of POCSO Act.

¶12

1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 18.02.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench.

¶13

1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.

¶14

Broadly speaking, allegation against the accused/applicant is that he forcibly raped a 13 years old girl. The FIR was registered on the statement of prosecutrix, alleging that she temporarily started living with her paternal aunt ( sister of her father ). There, the accused Vipin, husband of aunt of the

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2026 at 12:01:39

¶17

prosecutrix forcibly raped her multiple times. Co-accused Vijay Kumar, uncle of Vipin also raped her. Finally, she was raped by the present accused/applicant. In her FIR, the prosecutrix specifically described the manner in which she was raped.

¶18

Mr. Aakash Kumar, Advocate, counsel for accused/applicant, despite repeated requests, refuses to address arguments and submits that matter be passed over awaiting the other counsel, Mr. Vikash Padora, Advocate. As mentioned above, this application is pending for past more than one year. Fully knowing the condition of board of this court, counsel for accused/applicant seeks pass over so that once allowed, the matter may not reach till even 06:00pm.

¶19

At this stage, Mr. Aakash Kumar, Advocate, learned counsel for accused/applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh before the trial court in view of change in circumstances.

¶20

As requested, the bail application and accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.

¶21

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶22

APRIL 6, 2026/ ry

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2026 at 12:01:39

Vikas @ Vicky v. State, NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas @ Vicky v. State, NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Khurana & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Arunendra Kumar & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Nitin Kaushik Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Mr Rishikesh Singh Naorem Vs Air Customs

Anwar & Ors. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Kunal Bhatia Vs State of Govt NCT of Delhi