Allowed¶19

Raman v. the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC6 Jul 2026BAIL APPLN./2461/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted, Delhi HC, BAIL APPLN. 2461/2026, Raman v. State (NCT of Delhi), FIR No. 210/2026 PS Aman Vihar, Sections 309(4)/311/3(5) BNS, robbery/surveillance allegation, parity with co-accused Vikas (Sessions Court bail order dated 30.06.2026), failed TIP, personal bond Rs.10,000/- with one surety, Girish Kathpalia J., decision dated 06.07.2026.

What did the court decide?

Accused/applicant directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court; copy of the order to be transmitted immediately to the concerned Jail Superintendent. ¶19

Raman Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~73

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision: 06.07.2026

¶4

- BAIL APPLN. 2461/2026 & CRL.M.A. 19047/2026

¶5

RAMAN .....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate

¶7

versus

¶8

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents

¶9

Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Anil

¶10

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶11

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

¶12

The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 210/2026 of PS Aman Vihar for offence under Section 309(4)/311/3(5) BNS.

¶13

Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he along with co-accused Vikas kept surveillance outside the house while the remaining co-accused persons entered the house and committed the alleged robbery.

¶14

BAIL APPLN. 2461/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages

¶15

GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d 435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee6 KATHPALIA 0402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.06 17:22:53 +05'30'

¶16

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Da te:0 6.07.2026 17:56:06

¶17

Learned counsel for accused/applicant claims parity on the ground that the co-accused Vikas has been granted bail by the Court of Sessions by way of order dated 30.06.2026. It is also submitted that TIP proceedings pertaining to the accused/applicant failed.

¶18

Learned APP for State, assisted by IO/SI Anil accepts notice and in all fairness submits that there is nothing to oppose this application.

¶19

Therefore, the application is allowed and the accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

¶20

A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the concerned Jail Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant.

¶21

Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe GIRISH c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 KATHPALIA 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 01e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.06 17:23:13 +05'30' GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE)

¶22

JULY 06, 2026/ as

¶23

BAIL APPLN. 2461/2026

¶24

Page 2 of 2 pages

¶25

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Da te:0 6.07.2026 17:56:06

Raman v. the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raman v. the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Joginder Singh & Ors. Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Nitin Sharma & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Aman Dhamija Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi New Delhi & Ors.

Aarati @ Aarti Vs State

Jaswant Kumar Rao Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Sh Dhanush Raj Vs the State NCT of Delhi